Lumberjack scares tree away!!

Because those whale legs are sure to come in handy one day, right?

Girl is leaking Merlot

Scumbag Rick Santorum on Healthcare

SOURCE

This video is part of an article I wrote for www.visitscunthorpe.com please view the article to understand how the video came about. The article can been seen via the following link; http://www.visitscunthorpe.com/ScunthorpeNews/headline/Golden-Wonder-Security

Photography in a public place, in the main, isn’t against the law. There are very few exceptions like buildings deemed important to national security, etc.
There are also private properties that have public excess like shopping malls, libraries & hospitals, etc, photography in these types isn’t agianst the law but may be against company policy and if caught doing so you could be asked to leave. However, Golden Wonder security in Scunthorpe seem fit.

Credit Liberty Source for the Original Upload

Ron Paul embarrasses Rick Santorum CNN SC Republican Debate
1/19/12

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way authors have expressed themselves. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in a work.

The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.

When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.